Victory in South Africa!

6 May 2008 - 3:07pm
News

The Court found the enforced choice between pre-paid meter and standpipe to be unlawful and unconstitutional and ordered the City of Johannesburg to provide the full range of water delivery service options. The limitation of free basic water allocation of 6kl per household, per month is set aside and the city has been ordered to provide 50 litres per person, per day.

Judge Tsoka also determined that the City should bear all the legal costs of the applicants since 2006.

This is the first time, in which the constitutional right to water has explicitly been raised, and the judgement itself provided meaningful and clear reasons for the orders issued. Judge MP Toska "criticised the municipality for its discriminatory approach to the provision of water", finding that: "the underlying basis for the introduction of prepayment meters seems to me to be credit control. If this is true, I am unable to understand why this credit control measure is only suitable in the historically poor black areas and not the historically rich white areas. Bad payers cannot be described in terms of colour or geographical area."

The Judge went on to say that, "25 litres per person day is insufficient for the residents of Phiri ... to expect the applicants to restrict their water usage, to compromise their health, by limiting the number of toilet flushes in order to save water is to deny them the rights to health and to lead a dignified lifestyle."

The greatest credit for this extraordinary legal victory must go to the residents of Phiri that resisted the installation of the pre-paid meters, and to all the other residents of poor communities, both in Johannesburg and across the country, who have been fighting for accessible, affordable and sufficient water provision.

]]>

Tax Transparency Now

Demand the EU act for tax transparency now! 

 

Latest news

Reaction: UK abstention from UN vote on Protection of Palestinian Civilians

18 June 2018 - 11:15am
Responding to the UK's abstention from the UN General Assembly vote on the Protection of the Palestinian Civilian Population, War on Want's senior campaigner on militarism and security Ryvka Barnard, said: 
 
Read more

Press Comment: Pimlico Plumbers Supreme Court Ruling

13 June 2018 - 2:30pm
Responding to the Supreme Court judgement on the Pimlico Plumbers case, Owen Espley, labour rights campaigner at War on Want, says:
 
“New technology does not mean no rights. This is a victory for common sense and will benefit ordinary people all over the country who are denied basic rights such as holiday and sick pay. 
 
It is a stinging rebuke to the government for failing to uphold the law and forcing people to fight for their rights.
 
Read more

Join the conversation

Help workers win a stronger voice at work - support the by telling to recognise their union! https://t.co/KMHVOKLYEg 1 day 8 min ago
Stand up for Palestinian rights today: use our resources to learn and speak about the UK-Israel arms trade & what j… https://t.co/RWxCvS5L4v 1 day 19 hours ago
During the past 30 yrs of BP operations in Casanare, , 3000 trade union and community leaders – many voca… https://t.co/b6Vi36tir4 2 days 1 hour ago