Honduran women's group condemns sweatshop conditions

6 April 2009 - 2:10pm

Women's collective presents findings before rights commission

On the 23 March María Luisa Regalado, coordinator of Codemuh, a Honduran women's collective and War on Want partner organisation, presented a report to the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (IACHR) in Washington exposing the poor health and safety conditions in Honduran export processing zones (EPZs). The report found that the poor working conditions in these factories have negatively impacted on the health and well being of factory workers.

The report condemns the weak occupational health legislation in EPZs, which remains outdated and inadequate despite calls from campaigning organizations such as Codemuh. It details the failure of both factory management and the Honduran government to recognise and take responsibility in cases where workers have suffered severe work-related illnesses and injuries as a result of weak health and safety legislation.

Codemuh has asked the IACHR to visit Honduras in order to document the violation of health and safety rights in sweatshops and put pressure on the Honduran government to ensure that factories are regularly inspected and the health of workers is better protected. Codemuh recently presented to the Honduran Parliament a revised occupational health chapter for the country's labour code which safeguards the rights of workers. Codemuh's proposals are currently being reviewed by Honduran legislators.

A key part of the government's strategy to attract foreign investment, the EPZs in Honduras currently have 229 factories and employ more than 130,000 people of whom 69% are female. Western corporations take advantage of no tax, abundant cheap labour and limited trade union activity to cut production costs and maximise profits.

These corporate incentives come at the expense of Honduran workers. In a country where unemployment rates are high and social security is limited many people, especially women, have no choice but to take low paid jobs in sweatshops, where they are forced to work long hours in often unsafe working environments. The repetitive tasks involved in factory work combined with excessively high production targets cause severe health problems which in some cases have left women permanently injured and unable to work. Factory management has failed to take responsibility for these cases and workers have often been left with little or no compensation.

War on Want supports Codemuh's effort to implement robust safeguards for workers' rights in Honduras. Our work with Codemuh forms part of our broader programmatic work around defending workers' rights in sweatshops and plantations around the world.  You can read more about Codemuh's work on our website, and also see footage from their presentation to the IACHR.

7p an hour Primark workers ‘shame'

3 April 2009 - 3:37pm



Saturday, 4 April 2009

Anti-sweatshop campaigners demonstrate outside flagship Primark store on the eve of its second anniversary

WHEN? 2.30 pm BST, Saturday 4 April 2009

WHERE? Primark flagship store, 499-517 Oxford Street, London W1K 7DA

WHAT? Leading developing charity War on Want joins campaign group No Sweat as models weighted in chains stage a sweatshop fashion show outside the store

Chained models slave labour protest

The flagship store of Britain's most popular cheap fashion retailer Primark tomorrow faces a demonstration by chained models over its workers earning as little as 7p an hour for up to 80-hour weeks.

The models will stage a sweatshop fashion show outside the Oxford Street shop on the eve of its second anniversary.

This store sold one million items in its first ten days of trading and continues to flourish despite the recession.

And the retailer's profits jumped 17 per cent to £233 million during the 12 months ending in September.

Leading development charity War on Want will join campaign group No Sweat to spotlight the scandal that Bangladeshi employees making Primark clothes are worse off than two years ago when the store opened.

The latest War on Want report showed employees in the Bangladeshi capital Dhaka on the minimum wage, £13.97 (1663 taka) a month, and all of them earning far less than a living wage.

It cited average workers' pay as £19.16 (2280 taka) a month, less than half a living wage.

This contrasted with the retailer's 17 per cent profits jump to £233 million during the 12 months ending in September.

Employees calculated they need £44.82 (5333 taka) a month to give their family nutritious food, clean water, shelter, clothes, education, health care and transport.

Yet amid food and fuel inflation, employees' living standards have fallen since War on Want interviewed them two years earlier.

And on Monday the UN warned that two million children in Bangladesh suffered from acute malnutrition due to food price hikes.

War on Want spokesman Paul Collins said: "Primark's flagship store is thriving with clothes at rock bottom prices while workers producing them face deeper poverty. Gordon Brown's claim that the G20 summit deal will tackle global poverty ignores the reality that UK companies such as Primark are trapping people overseas in dire hardship. Unless he regulates British firms, growing numbers of the poor will pay a terrible price for the world economic crisis."


The War on Want report can be downloaded here

CONTACT: Paul Collins, War on Want media office (+44) (0)20 7549 0584 or (+44) (0)7983 550728

G20 slammed for ‘shortsighted' deal

2 April 2009 - 5:50pm


Thursday, 2 April 2009 G20 summit ends in London

Millions will suffer from summit failure, says charity

The anti-poverty charity War on Want today condemned Gordon Brown and other G20 leaders for throwing money at the global economic crisis rather than addressing its root causes.

According to War on Want, the G20 has used the London summit to resurrect the failed policies and institutions of the free market era, in a deal which prioritises short-term action at the expense of fundamental reform.

It called for a new world economic system based on principles of public benefit not private profit, achieved through democratic control and a fair redistribution of the fruits of globalisation.

War on Want executive director John Hilary said: "Millions of people will pay a high price for the G20's refusal to address the root causes of the current crisis.

"The world demanded a new economic system which puts the needs of people first. Instead the G20 have just thrown money at the failed institutions of the past."

War on Want said a stimulus package for the developing world is desperately needed. But the G20 decision to treble money available to the International Monetary Fund will resurrect an institution which lacks legitimacy and continues to impose crippling free market conditions on countries which turn to it for help.

The charity also attacked the G20 for its failure to take decisive action to close down tax havens. Tax dodging by corporations costs the UK economy £100 billion a year and deprives developing countries of an estimated £250 billion a year - money which could meet the UN anti-poverty goals several times over.

The charity warned that the G20 leaders' renewed insistence on a conclusion to the Doha world trade talks will deepen unemployment already soaring due to the global economic crisis. This puts 7.5 million workers at risk in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Indonesia, Mexico, Philippines, Tunisia and Uruguay, and millions more in other countries.

CONTACT: Paul Collins, War on Want media office (+44) (0)20 7549 0584 or (+44) (0)7983 550728

War on Want is a member of the Put People First alliance. Read the alliance's joint reaction to the  G20 communiqué.



Comment is free: G20: Barred from the summit

2 April 2009 - 1:00am

My accreditation has been withdrawn. Has the government decided only to allow non-critical organisations into major events?


War on Want in G20 City protest

31 March 2009 - 1:00am

Dead bird signals end of Canary Wharf system

Iraqi Civil Society Conference: final thoughts and outcomes

31 March 2009 - 12:00am

After over a week of meetings, the Iraqi Civil Society Conference came to a close. All of the participants have agreed that the conference represents a vital contribution to the strengthening of Iraqi civil society and building co-operation between these groups and international NGOs and activists.

For some Iraqis this was the first time that they were able to come together in a safe place to develop strategies for promoting non-violence and defending human rights in their country. For some international participants, who came from a range of countries including the UK, the US, Canada, Italy, France, India and the Phillipines, the conference was a rare opportunity to meet with Iraqis who have been active in opposing occupation and dictatorship.

There are several positive outcomes and actions to be followed up in the coming months. The key actions that came out of the conference can be found in the  final report, drawn up by a working committee of Iraqi and international participants. War on Want is proud to have played a key role in organising and participating in the event, and looks forward to continuing its work in building a vibrant and active civil society in Iraq.



Britain sells £27 million arms to Israel

30 March 2009 - 1:00am


Monday, 30 March 2009

Global day of action for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel to mark Palestine Land Day, the annual commemoration of the 1976 Israeli killing of Palestinians in Galilee during a protest over land being snatched.

Calls to UK government to stop arming Israel

Revelations that in the first nine months of last year Britain licensed the sale of military equipment to Israel worth £27 million today brought a call for the UK government to stop arming Israel.

The call, from the charity War on Want, step up pressure over Israel's occupation to mark a global day of action for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel. This initiative follows Israel's attack on Gaza which killed more than 1400 Palestinians, with children under 15 a third of the victims.

The admission that the UK government authorised lucrative trade in military equipment to Israel came in recent days from Lord Malloch-Brown, the British Foreign Minister, Lord Malloch-Brown, was answering questions from the crossbench peer Lord Hylton.

War on Want is calling for the British government to establish a two-way arms embargo on Israel.

Ruth Tanner, campaigns and policy director at War on Want, said: "Despite continued human rights abuses against the Palestinian people, the UK government licenses millions of pounds' worth of military equipment to Israel every year. By selling arms to Israel the UK is giving direct material support for Israel's aggression and sending a clear message of approval for its actions."

War on Want says that over the last 60 years Israel has defied UN resolutions, international law and global outrage over its treatment of the Palestinian people. The continuing occupation has destroyed any semblance of a Palestinian economy.

Today 70 per cent of Palestinians live in crushing poverty and more than half rely on food aid to survive. And the international community has largely ignored UN law over Israel's crimes. Instead the British government among others has rewarded Israeli aggression with financial, military and diplomatic support.

Known export licences approved from Britain to Israel in 2008 include components for: combat aircraft, electronic warfare equipment, helmet mounted display equipment, military aero-engines, naval radars, surface-to-air missiles and equipment for the use of weapon sights and military communication. A significant number of UK components are used for missile triggering systems for Apaches and Head-Up Displays for F-16s and Israel has used F-16 fighter aircraft and Apache combat helicopters to bomb Lebanese and Palestinian towns and villages.

The British government has repeatedly admitted it does not accept Israeli assurances that British arms will not be deployed in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Yet it continues to license such arms sales regardless.

In evidence to the parliamentary Quadripartite Committee in 2006, Foreign Office minister Kim Howells reaffirmed that it was government policy not to allow export of equipment or components which could be "deployed aggressively" in Palestinian territory, but then acknowledged that "almost any piece of equipment, I suppose, could be used aggressively".

War on Want says that since aircraft and tanks for which UK companies make components are regularly and obviously used aggressively against Palestinians, the government's practice appears to make its own export standards meaningless.

NOTE TO EDITORS: Link to the latest briefing from the coalition Stop Arming Israel which includes War on Want can be found here

CONTACT: Paul Collins, War on Want media office (+44) (0)20 7549 0584 or (+44) (0)7983 550728



Join the conversation

Hold to account for the social and environmental devastation have brought to Argentina and Colombia. Demand… 2 hours 15 min ago
Forcible displacement is a war crime. The UK must insist on the implementation of Palestinians' , in… 3 hours 1 min ago
Important call from Palestinian human rights groups for international civil society to undertake campaigns to… 3 hours 4 min ago