Victory in South Africa!

6 May 2008 - 3:07pm
News

The Court found the enforced choice between pre-paid meter and standpipe to be unlawful and unconstitutional and ordered the City of Johannesburg to provide the full range of water delivery service options. The limitation of free basic water allocation of 6kl per household, per month is set aside and the city has been ordered to provide 50 litres per person, per day.

Judge Tsoka also determined that the City should bear all the legal costs of the applicants since 2006.

This is the first time, in which the constitutional right to water has explicitly been raised, and the judgement itself provided meaningful and clear reasons for the orders issued. Judge MP Toska "criticised the municipality for its discriminatory approach to the provision of water", finding that: "the underlying basis for the introduction of prepayment meters seems to me to be credit control. If this is true, I am unable to understand why this credit control measure is only suitable in the historically poor black areas and not the historically rich white areas. Bad payers cannot be described in terms of colour or geographical area."

The Judge went on to say that, "25 litres per person day is insufficient for the residents of Phiri ... to expect the applicants to restrict their water usage, to compromise their health, by limiting the number of toilet flushes in order to save water is to deny them the rights to health and to lead a dignified lifestyle."

The greatest credit for this extraordinary legal victory must go to the residents of Phiri that resisted the installation of the pre-paid meters, and to all the other residents of poor communities, both in Johannesburg and across the country, who have been fighting for accessible, affordable and sufficient water provision.

]]>

Tax Transparency Now

Demand the EU act for tax transparency now! 

 

Latest news

Reaction: UK abstention from UN Gaza vote makes a mockery of commitment to international law

19 May 2018 - 9:00am

Trusting that Israel can fairly and neutrally investigate its own war crimes is an insult to any common sense definition of justice, and makes a mockery of the UK’s stated commitment to international law, human rights, and accountability

Read more

Press release: BP’s Manchester shareholder meeting faces protest over fracking and human rights abuses

16 May 2018 - 11:45am

Oil company’s first ever Annual General Meeting in Manchester faces protest with participants from communities affected by BP’s operations in Argentina and Colombia.

Read more

Join the conversation

Hold to account for the social and environmental devastation have brought to Argentina and Colombia. Demand… https://t.co/ssEVQmiG4W 2 hours 6 min ago
Forcible displacement is a war crime. The UK must insist on the implementation of Palestinians' , in… https://t.co/aeeHbguDda 2 hours 52 min ago
Important call from Palestinian human rights groups for international civil society to undertake campaigns to… https://t.co/FwlhVzY9Qc 2 hours 54 min ago