Does Priti Patel even understand how aid works?

26 October 2016 - 1:15pm
War on Want in the news

The International Development Secretary suggested that aid spending should not ‘exclude the whole areas of trade and trade opportunities’. Yet free trade agreements are a disaster for most people in poorer countries. A version of this article was first carried by the Independent.

Does International Development Secretary Priti Patel go out of her way to make the UK look greedy and cruel?

Her suggestion that we should use money allocated to fighting global poverty and inequality to secure post-Brexit trade deals  is utterly wrong – particularly when these deals chiefly benefit big business.

What next? With some MPs demanding a Royal Yacht to help win new trade deals, will she oblige by diverting some of the aid budget to buy one?

The warning signs were clear when Patel took charge of the Department for International Development (DFID). She had already said DFID should be axed to form a new Department for International Trade and Development.

That never happened but there is effectively an informal merger with the new Department for International Trade, under Liam Fox, as they plan “joint missions” overseas to look for “economic opportunities” for British businesses.

Now, in Brexit Britain, Patel is breezing through Africa suggesting that the wheels of new corporate-led trade UK deals should be oiled with money from the aid budget.

This is plain wrong. For a rich country like the UK to see “aid” only in terms of how it can create economic opportunities, serve the “national interest”, and benefit “us” is shocking. But remember, it is not really “us”, as in you and me. These deals benefit multinational corporations and investors by stripping a country and its people of the power to protect its own industries and services. 

Put simply, free trade agreements are bad for most people in the poorer countries. They harm producers by driving down prices of goods and removing protective tariffs. Regulations on environment, health and safety are often weakened or cut, meaning a race to the bottom for all.

Moreover, privatisation is often at the core of these deals, meaning big businesses move in to run schools, water or health services at a profit. And the deals are rarely actually “free”. Rich countries inevitably maintain protection of their own exports, while the competitors in poor countries are forced to agree to open their markets.

The drive to produce at the lowest cost is paramount for those pushing these trade deals and is pushed at the expense of workers, land and water resources. Thus free trade agreements pull poor countries deeper into poverty. They should not be a focus for DFID.

Yes, DFID’s mission needs to be reviewed because aid is already being used to heavily promote the interests of multinational companies in Africa, rather than fighting poverty and inequality. But Patel’s multilateral aid review must ensure the aid budget is only used for genuine poverty reduction initiatives, such as support for small-scale farming, improving education or healthcare rather than boosting the profits of big business.

If Patel really wanted to help developing countries, she would also push for an immediate abolition of the UK’s own global network of tax havens, which fuel tax evasion, corruption and money laundering.

It is estimated that the world’s governments lose an astonishing $3 trillion of revenue every year in tax evasion and tax avoidance schemes; money vital for tackling inequality and funding public services.

The UK should also be pushing hard for comprehensive public country-by-country reporting that compels companies to publish key information about where they are doing business, earning their profits and paying their taxes.

Unless this move to divert aid money toward toxic trade deals is halted, and action taken on tax dodging, it is hard to take seriously this Government's commitment to tackling global poverty.

Vicki Hird is campaigns and policy director at War on Want. 

Latest news

National action for trade democracy

23 November 2017 - 2:30pm

Join a two day mobilisation to build the campaign for trade democracy, organised by Global Justice Now and War on Want.

Thanks to the hard work of activists on the ground, and the brazenness of the government, trade democracy is climbing up the political agenda. Over 100 MPs have signed an EDM calling for increased parliamentary scrutiny over trade deals. The SNP are calling for Scotland to have its own trade policy. People don’t want chlorinated chicken flooding UK supermarkets. Now is the time to strengthen the campaign for trade democracy.

Read more

Watch videos of "Paradises of the Earth" Web Documentary - Tunisia

23 November 2017 - 8:15am

First Episode - Gabes: Watch now!

This episode follows an international solidarity caravan to the first stop of the trip: the mediterranean oasis of Gabes in southern #Tunisia, where the installation of a chemical phosphate factory on its shores caused an ecocide deeply impacting fishing, agriculture, water resources and people's livelihoods.

Read more

Join the conversation

RT @TatGaravito: “Justice for indigenous communities in Colombia means looking back at the legacy of colonialism and acting based on the ju… 12 hours 48 min ago
NOW: Our partners in parliament with @HumanRightsAPPG and @ABColombia1 - Colombia Securing Peace: Women's Achieveme… https://t.co/Rg8UMWuO4G 13 hours 3 min ago
Next week: Disrupt the #MinesAndMoney conference in London! Join activists from Uganda, Philippines and Colombia in… https://t.co/nhXFrlcfAJ 1 day 4 hours ago