A brutal assassination but the government turns a blind eye

15 September 2015 - 9:45am
News

Graciela Romero Vasquez, International Programmes Director, War on Want. An edited version of this article was first published at New Internationalist

Mining routinely disrupts and destroys people’s lives and livelihoods – it forces people from their land and devastates the natural environment on which they depend.  And more often than not, the expansion of mining and resource extraction by large corporations brings with it violence and intimidation.

Militarised conflict is one of the chief causes of poverty. When fuelled by greed for resources, it is civilians and local communities who suffer, and big business that profits.

For human rights defenders across the world, the fight for justice is frequently met with brutal repression and all too often the tragic and needless loss of life.

In July 2015, human fights defenders met in the Philippines for the annual International People’s Conference on Mining. Less than a month later, one of them was dead – brutally assassinated in Mindanao, Philippines.

Since 2005, Emerito Samarca, Executive Director of the Alternative Learning Centre for Agricultural and Livelihood Development (ALCADEV) had been fighting for the rights of the Lumad, a group of indigenous people defending themselves and their ancestral homelands against the threat of mining.

On 1 September 2015, 40 soldiers and a paramilitary group occupied the local school and threatened to massacre the entire community unless they left within 48 hours. This was when Emerito and two local leaders were killed in broad daylight, as the community looked on. Fearing for their lives, some 2,000 indigenous people fled. Forced from their homes, this was the latest in a long history of violence and intimidation.

Illegal arrests, detention and torture

For a decade now, community members have been the victims of trumped-up criminal charges, illegal arrests and detention, and torture. Shamefully, to date, the local government has turned a blind eye to these recent atrocities, failing also to provide any humanitarian assistance for the people bullied from their land and forced from their homes.

KARAPATAN, an alliance of individuals, groups and organizations working for the promotion and protection of human rights in the Philippines, has since stated that the collusion between the state armed forces and paramilitary groups had been reported in previous cases where community leaders had been killed.

While innocent people are being murdered in the Philippines, on the other side of the Atlantic, 16 community leaders in Peru are facing up to 35 years in prison for publically expressing their opposition to the World Bank and US owned Newmont Mining’s “Conga Project” (a gold and copper mining venture in the northern highlands of Peru). Some of these leaders have also been physically attacked by Peru’s state forces during public protests, and five people were killed during public demonstrations against the project. Yet the Peruvian government has yet to bring anyone to justice.

In both the Philippines and Peru, human rights defenders have raised grave concerns over allegations of collusion between state armed forces and corporations such as Glencore in the Philippines and Newmont Mining Corporation in Peru. Moreover, in Peru, the involvement of both the Catholic Church and the World Bank shows the extent to which international and national bodies are complicit in human rights violations. Both of these institutions have a stake in the Conga Project and both have refused to condemn the killings and repression of communities and their leaders. The Archbishop of Lima has even publicly acknowledged the Church will be a direct beneficiary of the Conga Project.

Criminalisation of protest

Human rights defenders and community leaders have long been accused of terrorism, incitement to violence and public intimidation by governments determined to silence dissenting voices. Trumped up criminal charges and other onerous judicial processes, lasting for years, not only nullify the work of human rights defenders but serve to deter others from speaking out. Ultimately, the legitimate right to protest is criminalized by the state - the impact of which can be severely distressing.

In both Peru and the Philippines human rights defenders suffer long-term psychological pressure as a result of having to endure endless judicial processes, where hearings are frequently postponed and further financial costs are incurred. In many cases, people are detained for long periods without being charged. In the Philippines, a female community leader recently explained how she had to attend a hearing every month, paying fees for each session over a period of two years. To this day she doesn’t know what the charges against her are for.

Forcing people from their homes and silencing anyone who opposes the plundering of resources appears to be the norm for extractive industries. And with help from the state, it seems their unofficial handbook reads: militarise territories with the army and paramilitary forces, use the judicial system to criminalise human rights defenders, create conditions which divide communities and buy up community leaders. And if these tactics don’t work? Massacre and displace local people.

While it is clear that the recent killings in Mindanao and those of others fighting injustice around the world cannot go unpunished, it’s testament to the remarkable courage and determination of human rights defenders, and those communities facing off against extractive industries, that the struggle to hold companies and governments to account for their crimes goes on. The people are resolute; they’re fighting back. And War on Want stands with them.

Latest news

Comment: Supreme Court must find for worker's rights in gig economy case

20 February 2018 - 11:30am

Speaking ahead of the Supreme Court hearing on the ‘Pimlico Plumbers’ Gig Economy Case, Owen Espley Labour Rights campaigner at War on Want said:

“The supreme court case must confirm what many courts have already decided, that claiming these workers were self-employed is a ploy to dodge taxes and deny worker’s rights, such as holiday and sick pay.

Read more

War on Want's commitment to safeguarding and code of conduct

16 February 2018 - 10:30am

The recent reports regarding the conduct of staff working for international humanitarian and development charities focussing on Oxfam, is a crucial reminder of the importance that charities should place on ensuring effective policies and practices in safeguarding, including commitments to recognise and uphold the dignity of local communities that the sector works with.

Read more

Join the conversation

"Many people remember apartheid as a dark chapter in the history of #SouthAfrica and the world. But for the Palesti… https://t.co/JEjoWfpEsh 2 hours 49 min ago
“You can’t separate peace from freedom because no one can be at peace unless he has his freedom.” – #MalcolmX https://t.co/n584lGhIV0 3 hours 13 min ago
What is #apartheid, and how does that word describe #Israel’s regime of control over Palestinians? War on Want's… https://t.co/xc5BbzVk3X 4 hours 13 min ago