Victory in South Africa!

6 May 2008 - 3:07pm
News

The Court found the enforced choice between pre-paid meter and standpipe to be unlawful and unconstitutional and ordered the City of Johannesburg to provide the full range of water delivery service options. The limitation of free basic water allocation of 6kl per household, per month is set aside and the city has been ordered to provide 50 litres per person, per day.

Judge Tsoka also determined that the City should bear all the legal costs of the applicants since 2006.

This is the first time, in which the constitutional right to water has explicitly been raised, and the judgement itself provided meaningful and clear reasons for the orders issued. Judge MP Toska "criticised the municipality for its discriminatory approach to the provision of water", finding that: "the underlying basis for the introduction of prepayment meters seems to me to be credit control. If this is true, I am unable to understand why this credit control measure is only suitable in the historically poor black areas and not the historically rich white areas. Bad payers cannot be described in terms of colour or geographical area."

The Judge went on to say that, "25 litres per person day is insufficient for the residents of Phiri ... to expect the applicants to restrict their water usage, to compromise their health, by limiting the number of toilet flushes in order to save water is to deny them the rights to health and to lead a dignified lifestyle."

The greatest credit for this extraordinary legal victory must go to the residents of Phiri that resisted the installation of the pre-paid meters, and to all the other residents of poor communities, both in Johannesburg and across the country, who have been fighting for accessible, affordable and sufficient water provision.

]]>

Tax Transparency Now

Demand the EU act for tax transparency now! 

 

Latest news

Comment: Supreme Court must find for worker's rights in gig economy case

20 February 2018 - 11:30am

Speaking ahead of the Supreme Court hearing on the ‘Pimlico Plumbers’ Gig Economy Case, Owen Espley Labour Rights campaigner at War on Want said:

“The supreme court case must confirm what many courts have already decided, that claiming these workers were self-employed is a ploy to dodge taxes and deny worker’s rights, such as holiday and sick pay.

Read more

War on Want's commitment to safeguarding and code of conduct

16 February 2018 - 10:30am

The recent reports regarding the conduct of staff working for international humanitarian and development charities focussing on Oxfam, is a crucial reminder of the importance that charities should place on ensuring effective policies and practices in safeguarding, including commitments to recognise and uphold the dignity of local communities that the sector works with.

Read more

Join the conversation

THIS FRIDAY: Don't miss @BZephaniah live at #SoundsofResistance – dedicated to the ongoing struggle of the Palestin… https://t.co/cV6hinFs4U 17 hours 14 min ago
This #SocialJusticeDay, focused on workers on the move, we must pledge to #StandWithMigrantWorkers and demand equal… https://t.co/6BkjHdh8r7 18 hours 11 min ago
This #SocialJusticeDay, #StandWithMigrantWorkers and demand that all workers get their basic rights at work respect… https://t.co/3GtuIVNT1d 19 hours 31 min ago