UK banks must drop their deadly investments in the arms trade

21 July 2017 - 12:00pm
War on Want in the news

Ryvka Barnard is War on Want’s senior militarism and security campaigner. This article was first carried by Middle East Eye.

Three years ago this month, Israel launched a full-scale military attack on Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. After 50 horrendous days, more than 2,250 Palestinians had been killed and half a million displaced. The attacks involved strikes from air and sea, and extensive use of artillery and ground incursions by Israeli armed forces.

Now, years later, tens of thousands in Gaza remain displaced, wounded, physically and psychologically scarred. The already devastating poverty and insecurity in the Gaza Strip has increased, with over 70 percent of the population at risk of illness due to water contamination and 60 percent food insecure. All two million residents suffer from chronic electricity shortages, with current rates at as little as four hours of power a day.

This poverty and insecurity is a direct result of the blockade on the Strip, considered by the UN to be collective punishment, a war crime under international law. The blockade is enforced by the Israeli military - with help from its friends in Egypt - with gunboats off the coast, a wall with watchtowers and remote-controlled sniper guns, and scores of armed and surveillance drones.

While Palestinians struggle for survival, arms companies are making a killing.

What these weapons do

Companies such as BAE Systems, Lockheed Martin and Raytheon produce and export weapons to Israel used in daily violence against Palestinians. These weapons are used at armed checkpoints, restricting Palestinian movement in the West Bank. They are used in the targeting of fisherfolk in Gaza, shot if their boats stray beyond the narrow restricted fishing zone, as happened to Mohammed Bakr, killed by the Israeli navy in May 2017.

Israeli navy sailors on the look out at the port in Ashdod in 2014 (AFP)

They arm the snipers taking shots at unarmed protesters, often resulting in injury or death, as was the case with Baraa Hamamda, a teen killed by Israeli soldiers who stormed his refugee camp early Friday morning. They provide tear gas grenade launchers, showering West Bank villages with toxic gas, sometimes causing deaths, like the 18-month-old baby Abdul Rahman Barghouti who died when Israeli tear gas canisters flew into his house.

This violence is only possible because of Israel’s trade in deadly arms with countries and companies around the world. Some of the UK’s biggest banks and financial institutions are invested in and loan funds to the companies selling weapons and military technology to Israel. Banks and financial institutions are a crucial link in the chain of Palestinian oppression.

Excuses, excuses

War on Want’s new report, "Deadly Investments", exposes the business relationships between UK banks and financial institutions, and companies known to supply Israel with weapons and technology used in the oppression of Palestinians.

Some banks and financial institutions maintain these business relationships despite stated commitments to human rights. HSBC, for example, has a Defence Policy, which states that it has been progressively withdrawing from arms trade investments since 2000.  

However, we found HSBC listed as a shareholder in all 19 arms companies we looked at, with investments totalling more than $1bn.

HSBC has told us that its shares in arms companies are usually held on behalf of clients. But HSBC refused to categorically state that it does not directly hold shares, and its use of the term "usually" suggests that it does. Even when it comes to holdings on behalf of clients, HSBC still benefits from the transactions being able to freely hold those shares on behalf of clients, while claiming that it has no moral responsibility otherwise.

These excuses don't hold up to scrutiny. 

This June, the Office of the UN High Commission on Human Rights issued guidance clarifying the obligations that banks have in respect of human rights under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The document makes clear that banks’ business relationships with human rights abusing companies make them complicit.

The steps HSBC and others need to take are clear: end their business relationships immediately with companies selling weapons and military technology to Israel and any other regime committing systematic violations of international law.

Divest once and for all

While ultimately it is the Israeli government that must be held to account over its violations of Palestinian rights, it can continue to shirk responsibility so long as governments and companies around the world continue to lend material support to commit its crimes.

This is the insight lent to us by the Palestinian call for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions, which 12 years ago proclaimed that Palestinians have had enough of waiting for Israel to spontaneously decide to end its decades-old belligerence. The BDS call stretched out a hand to civil society around the world, asking us to look at the companies in our communities that are aiding Israel’s war crimes.

HSBC, with branches on all of our high streets, put in place its defence policy because of popular pressure and campaigns to end bank complicity in the arms trade. So we have our work cut out for us too: to push HSBC to take seriously its stated commitment to human rights and a safer world, and divest from the arms trade once and for all.

 

HSBC: Stop Arming Israel

Email the head of HSBC, and tell him to end HSBC complicity in Israel's crimes against the Palestinian people.

Latest news

Comment: Supreme Court must find for worker's rights in gig economy case

20 February 2018 - 11:30am

Speaking ahead of the Supreme Court hearing on the ‘Pimlico Plumbers’ Gig Economy Case, Owen Espley Labour Rights campaigner at War on Want said:

“The supreme court case must confirm what many courts have already decided, that claiming these workers were self-employed is a ploy to dodge taxes and deny worker’s rights, such as holiday and sick pay.

Read more

War on Want's commitment to safeguarding and code of conduct

16 February 2018 - 10:30am

The recent reports regarding the conduct of staff working for international humanitarian and development charities focussing on Oxfam, is a crucial reminder of the importance that charities should place on ensuring effective policies and practices in safeguarding, including commitments to recognise and uphold the dignity of local communities that the sector works with.

Read more

Join the conversation

Our action at @Tate tonight calling on #UNIQLO to pay up the $5.5m owed to garment workers. Sign their petition:… https://t.co/KNtr8GsUKi 10 hours 9 min ago
.@UCU has made the campaign against casual contracts one of its national priorities. Staff on casual contracts may… https://t.co/onA2qUUBHh 13 hours 12 sec ago
University employers are attacking security for everyone. They want it to be cheaper and easier to hire and fire, w… https://t.co/AwdwFVXu3H 14 hours 34 sec ago