UK banks must drop their deadly investments in the arms trade

21 July 2017 - 12:00pm
War on Want in the news

Ryvka Barnard is War on Want’s senior militarism and security campaigner. This article was first carried by Middle East Eye.

Three years ago this month, Israel launched a full-scale military attack on Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. After 50 horrendous days, more than 2,250 Palestinians had been killed and half a million displaced. The attacks involved strikes from air and sea, and extensive use of artillery and ground incursions by Israeli armed forces.

Now, years later, tens of thousands in Gaza remain displaced, wounded, physically and psychologically scarred. The already devastating poverty and insecurity in the Gaza Strip has increased, with over 70 percent of the population at risk of illness due to water contamination and 60 percent food insecure. All two million residents suffer from chronic electricity shortages, with current rates at as little as four hours of power a day.

This poverty and insecurity is a direct result of the blockade on the Strip, considered by the UN to be collective punishment, a war crime under international law. The blockade is enforced by the Israeli military - with help from its friends in Egypt - with gunboats off the coast, a wall with watchtowers and remote-controlled sniper guns, and scores of armed and surveillance drones.

While Palestinians struggle for survival, arms companies are making a killing.

What these weapons do

Companies such as BAE Systems, Lockheed Martin and Raytheon produce and export weapons to Israel used in daily violence against Palestinians. These weapons are used at armed checkpoints, restricting Palestinian movement in the West Bank. They are used in the targeting of fisherfolk in Gaza, shot if their boats stray beyond the narrow restricted fishing zone, as happened to Mohammed Bakr, killed by the Israeli navy in May 2017.

Israeli navy sailors on the look out at the port in Ashdod in 2014 (AFP)

They arm the snipers taking shots at unarmed protesters, often resulting in injury or death, as was the case with Baraa Hamamda, a teen killed by Israeli soldiers who stormed his refugee camp early Friday morning. They provide tear gas grenade launchers, showering West Bank villages with toxic gas, sometimes causing deaths, like the 18-month-old baby Abdul Rahman Barghouti who died when Israeli tear gas canisters flew into his house.

This violence is only possible because of Israel’s trade in deadly arms with countries and companies around the world. Some of the UK’s biggest banks and financial institutions are invested in and loan funds to the companies selling weapons and military technology to Israel. Banks and financial institutions are a crucial link in the chain of Palestinian oppression.

Excuses, excuses

War on Want’s new report, "Deadly Investments", exposes the business relationships between UK banks and financial institutions, and companies known to supply Israel with weapons and technology used in the oppression of Palestinians.

Some banks and financial institutions maintain these business relationships despite stated commitments to human rights. HSBC, for example, has a Defence Policy, which states that it has been progressively withdrawing from arms trade investments since 2000.  

However, we found HSBC listed as a shareholder in all 19 arms companies we looked at, with investments totalling more than $1bn.

HSBC has told us that its shares in arms companies are usually held on behalf of clients. But HSBC refused to categorically state that it does not directly hold shares, and its use of the term "usually" suggests that it does. Even when it comes to holdings on behalf of clients, HSBC still benefits from the transactions being able to freely hold those shares on behalf of clients, while claiming that it has no moral responsibility otherwise.

These excuses don't hold up to scrutiny. 

This June, the Office of the UN High Commission on Human Rights issued guidance clarifying the obligations that banks have in respect of human rights under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The document makes clear that banks’ business relationships with human rights abusing companies make them complicit.

The steps HSBC and others need to take are clear: end their business relationships immediately with companies selling weapons and military technology to Israel and any other regime committing systematic violations of international law.

Divest once and for all

While ultimately it is the Israeli government that must be held to account over its violations of Palestinian rights, it can continue to shirk responsibility so long as governments and companies around the world continue to lend material support to commit its crimes.

This is the insight lent to us by the Palestinian call for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions, which 12 years ago proclaimed that Palestinians have had enough of waiting for Israel to spontaneously decide to end its decades-old belligerence. The BDS call stretched out a hand to civil society around the world, asking us to look at the companies in our communities that are aiding Israel’s war crimes.

HSBC, with branches on all of our high streets, put in place its defence policy because of popular pressure and campaigns to end bank complicity in the arms trade. So we have our work cut out for us too: to push HSBC to take seriously its stated commitment to human rights and a safer world, and divest from the arms trade once and for all.

 

HSBC: Stop Arming Israel

Email the head of HSBC, and tell him to end HSBC complicity in Israel's crimes against the Palestinian people.

Latest news

Watch videos of "Paradises of the Earth" Web Documentary - Tunisia

23 November 2017 - 8:15am

First Episode - Gabes: Watch now!

This episode follows an international solidarity caravan to the first stop of the trip: the mediterranean oasis of Gabes in southern #Tunisia, where the installation of a chemical phosphate factory on its shores caused an ecocide deeply impacting fishing, agriculture, water resources and people's livelihoods.

Read more

The Ecologist: President Santos: environmental saint or sinner?

21 November 2017 - 11:00am

President Santos of Colombia recently won two international awards for championing peace and biodiversity despite criticism from campaigners who say he is "encouraging agro-industrial projects that displace local communities", writes Catherine Early at The Ecologist (20 November 2017).

Quoting War on Want's Seb Muñoz, Early writes about the controversies around Santos' contributions, including the issue of displacing indigenous people through destructive extraction industries:

Read more

Join the conversation

RT @TatGaravito: “Justice for indigenous communities in Colombia means looking back at the legacy of colonialism and acting based on the ju… 3 hours 50 min ago
NOW: Our partners in parliament with @HumanRightsAPPG and @ABColombia1 - Colombia Securing Peace: Women's Achieveme… https://t.co/Rg8UMWuO4G 4 hours 6 min ago
Next week: Disrupt the #MinesAndMoney conference in London! Join activists from Uganda, Philippines and Colombia in… https://t.co/nhXFrlcfAJ 19 hours 38 min ago