UK and France paid 24m euros in Calais migrants ISDS case

2 August 2015 - 5:30pm
Press release

A spokesperson for the company Eurotunnel has revealed that the UK and French governments were required by a private arbitration tribunal to pay out nearly 24 million euros for failing to provide adequate security around the entrance to the Channel Tunnel between 1999 and 2002.

While the judgement has long been available on the website of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague, the size of the award has only now been disclosed in connection with the current migrant crisis in Calais.

The Eurotunnel case is one of only two known instances in which the UK government has faced a claim under the controversial investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism, which allows companies to sue governments before private arbitration tribunals for loss of profits.

The other known case involving the UK, which has been shrouded in even greater secrecy, was filed by Indian solicitor Ashok Sancheti under the UK-India bilateral investment treaty, and stems from a rent dispute over premises he had leased from the Corporation of London.

In the Eurotunnel case, the tribunal ruled in favour of the company's claim that the UK and French governments had failed to live up to their responsibilities under the 1986 Treaty of Canterbury, which governs the running of the Channel Tunnel, but dismissed a parallel claim relating to the provision of subsidies by the French government to ferry operator SeaFrance.

It remains unknown whether the UK and France were each required to pay half of the award.

PCA tribunal in Eurotunnel case

Photo: PCA tribunal members in the Eurotunnel case

Latest news

WATCH NOW: How garment workers are exploited

27 April 2017 - 5:00pm

War on Want’s Senior International Programmes Officer (Asia and the Pacific),Thulsi Narayanasamy, talks garment worker exploitation on 'Economic Divide'  (14 April 2017)

Read more

BDS is a legitimate means of protest against human rights abuse, says War on Want

27 April 2017 - 12:15pm

Campaigning for BDS is a legitimate means of protest, a fact that has been affirmed time and time again by bodies such as the European Union. It’s effectiveness is one of the main reasons why there is an organised campaign led by the Israeli government to shut it down. Students have every right to use their democratic rights to organise and exercise freedom of expression, and should be applauded for calling out violations of international law and human rights abuse.

Read more

Join the conversation

RT @protestencil: Students and staff @SOAS voted overwhelmingly for #BDS , so of course want #ApartheidOffCampus https://t.co/aISTOT0eJO 2 days 8 hours ago
@WarOnWant in solidarity on 28 April with all those killed at work #WorkersMemorialDay Poignant as we commemorate 4th Anniv of Rana Plaza 2 days 10 hours ago
Political prisoners hunger strike, day 11 'Palestinians launch general strike to support protesting prisoners' https://t.co/a6AxaURnTX 2 days 12 hours ago