Newcastle City Council opposes government's anti-democratic plan

8 February 2016 - 7:00am
Press release

War on Want welcomes the news that Newcastle City Council has voted to approve a motion opposing the government’s latest attack on local democracy.

The motion was passed unanimously, with full cross party support, at a recent council meeting. It is now official Newcastle City Council policy.

In November 2015, the government announced a proposal to block local councils from deciding how to invest their pension funds. Under the new plan, the government will have the power to veto investment decisions made locally on ethical grounds concerning human rights, arms trade, fossil fuels and much else.

Councillor Mick Bowman, North Heaton ward, said: "This vindictive and ideologically motivated proposal, reminiscent of the­­­ notorious Clause 28 introduced by the Tories in 1988, is a blanket attempt to prevent local councils from having an ethical procurement and pensions investment policy.

"Newcastle is a city with a proud commitment to human rights and many local councillors are active in social justice campaigns, including the movement for justice for Palestine, and we are determined to do whatever we can to block this proposal."

Ryvka Barnard, Senior Militarism and Security Campaigner at War on Want, said:“Newcastle City Council is fighting back, as are councils across the country, rightly concerned by the government’s attack on democracy and local decision making.

“So much for George Osborne’s so called ‘devolution revolution’. The government’s action has consistently failed to match its rhetoric when it comes to localism and devolving power. This plan amounts to a shutdown of local democratic space and is a dangerous threat to the growing power of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, which aims to end UK complicity in Israel’s abuses of Palestinian human rights.”

Over 10,000 people have responded to the government consultation, rejecting the proposal.

The ‘Protect Local Democracy’ campaign, initiated by War on Want, has been endorsed by a broad range of groups concerned with the human rights and environmental implications of the proposal. UNISON has also expressed concern that the proposal will deny pension scheme members their right to have their pension funds invested in their best interests.

 

NOTES TO EDITORS

For further information or interviews, contact Ross Hemingway on +44 7983 550728

'Protect Local Democracy' campaign is here

Government consultation is here

Latest news

Fashion brand Uniqlo’s sponsorship of Tate Modern in the spotlight over garment worker exploitation

23 February 2018 - 4:15pm
Last night, campaigners projected a series of messages to UNIQLO CEO, Tadashi Yanai demanding that the Japanese fast fashion chain takes responsibility for 2000 workers, collectively owed $5.5 million in unpaid wages and severance payments.
 
 
Read more

Comment: Supreme Court must find for worker's rights in gig economy case

20 February 2018 - 11:30am

Speaking ahead of the Supreme Court hearing on the ‘Pimlico Plumbers’ Gig Economy Case, Owen Espley Labour Rights campaigner at War on Want said:

“The supreme court case must confirm what many courts have already decided, that claiming these workers were self-employed is a ploy to dodge taxes and deny worker’s rights, such as holiday and sick pay.

Read more

Join the conversation

RT @BZephaniah: @Art4PalestineUK @WarOnWant @Jafrasha @Remroum @TamerNafar @RichMixLondon @MarsmUk I too am proud to be part of the resista… 5 hours 3 min ago
Support the #McStrike! Call on #McDonalds CEO to recognise the McStrikers’ union! #EndPrecariousContractshttps://t.co/XMYxB9uf0w 6 hours 49 min ago
RT @Art4PalestineUK: @WarOnWant @Jafrasha @Remroum @TamerNafar @BZephaniah @RichMixLondon @MarsmUk So proud to have been associated with #S 20 hours 31 min ago