Fox breaks promise to hold parliament debate on Brexit template trade deal

6 February 2017 - 8:30am
Press release

International Trade Secretary Liam Fox MP has broken a promise to have EU-Canada deal CETA (Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) debated in the House of Commons, instead arranging for the deal to be 'debated' today (Monday 6 February) in parliament's European Committee B.

The European Parliament will vote on CETA on February 15. If the deal passes, it will come into immediate effect for the UK: the only country-by-country impact assessment of the deal highlights that it will cost 10,000 jobs in the UK, and 200,000 across Europe.

War on Want senior trade campaigner Mark Dearn said: 

"It is scandalous that while telling us he has 'taken back control' from Europe, Liam Fox has signed us up to a secretly negotiated European Commission trade deal that will hit the UK before, during and after Brexit without any debate in parliament. This sets a dangerous precedent for the new trade deals the government intends to negotiate after Brexit, particularly as it believes CETA to be a template for a deal with the EU.

"CETA will cause job losses, and it commits us to public services privatisation and the introduction of a 'corporate court' system so big business in the USA and Canada can sue our goverment in a private legal system. These are fundamental changes to the British legal and political system which MPs must debate on the floor of the UK parliament.  Anything less is a travesty of democracy."

CETA has already been identified as a template for a UK-EU post-Brexit trade deal. It was negotiated wholly in secret over five years, locks in privatisation of public services and introduces 'corporate court' powers for North American business to sue European governments in a separate court system for policy choices affecting past or future business profits.

In October 2016, Fox appeared before parliament's EU scruntiy committee where he admitted and apologised for intentionally side-stepping parliamentary scrutiny on CETA. Fox told the committee CETA is "worth a great deal in terms of jobs, investment and prosperity” and that, schedules allowing, there would be a debate in the UK parliament on CETA in November 2016.

Committee chair Sir William Cash MP told Fox: "Overriding scrutiny on an agreement of such evident legal and political importance, given our Standing Orders, before MPs have had an opportunity to debate its content and implications for the UK is a serious matter."

Weeks later the European Parliament Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ruled that “evidence shows that the agreement [CETA] would contribute to widening the income gap between unskilled and skilled workers thus increasing inequalities and social tensions”.

CETA is opposed by civil society groups and trade unions across Europe. The Labour Party is also opposed to CETA, with Labour MEP Jude Kirton-Darling arguing that "CETA is risky for public services, weakens the rule of law and is not good enough for workers and the environment."

 

Notes for Editors

For more information and interviews contact Ross Hemingway 07983 550728

CETA in European Committee B, February 6 2017

Liam Fox apologise before EU scrutiny committee in October 2016

European Parliament EMPL Committee opinion on CETA

Tufts University, CETA Without Blinders: How Cutting ‘Trade Costs and More’ Will Cause Unemployment, Inequality and Welfare Losses

Jude Kirton-Darling MEP,  Why I Would Vote Against CETA

 

Latest news

BDS is a legitimate means of protest against human rights abuse, says War on Want

14 December 2017 - 12:15pm

Campaigning for BDS is a legitimate means of protest, a fact that has been affirmed time and time again by bodies such as the European Union. It’s effectiveness is one of the main reasons why there is an organised campaign led by the Israeli government to shut it down. Students have every right to use their democratic rights to organise and exercise freedom of expression, and should be applauded for calling out violations of international law and human rights abuse.

Read more

Was it too much to expect the WTO to deliver for women?

14 December 2017 - 12:00pm

Argentina, host for this week’s World Trade Organisation, welcomed hundreds of government representatives to Buenos Aires to negotiate the rules of the global trade in goods, services and ecommerce. Lagging far behind other international fora, the WTO made attempts to draw attention to the impact of trade on gender equality, and correspondingly the impact women’s economic productivity can have on trade.

Read more

Join the conversation

Get your holiday gifts in while there's still time with these political products from our online shop.… https://t.co/mr8MA9SY80 13 hours 8 min ago
Was it too much to hope the #WTO would deliver for #women? We ask: https://t.co/kXHmd0SUrH https://t.co/RO070EtRVb 16 hours 57 min ago
At the end of a week of failed #WTO negotiations, read our take on how their policies have failed #women globally:… https://t.co/FxAh1m69y9 1 day 16 hours ago