European Commission slammed over ‘new’ private court system

17 February 2016 - 12:15am
Press release

A new report published today slams the European Commission’s recent proposal on corporate investment courts as nothing more than a cynical rebranding exercise, that highlights the EC’s continued support for big business at the expense of the people of Europe.

Over the past two years, across Europe, much public controversy has surrounded a previously obscure element in international trade agreements: the investor-state dispute settlement system (ISDS). ISDS allows foreign companies to sue governments in their own privileged judicial system for any changes in public policy that affect their profits.   

The European Commission received a record response when it consulted the people of Europe over whether they wanted ISDS.  The answer was unequivocal: over 97% rejected the system.

Last year EU trade commissioner Cecilia Malmström conceded that ISDS is “the most toxic acronym in Europe”, and in response the European Commission released a revised proposal for all the EU’s ongoing and future investment negotiations, including the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Instead of the ‘old’ ISDS system, the Commission promised a ‘new’ and independent system: the Investment Court System or ICS.

John Hilary, Executive Director at War on Want, said:

“The European Commission’s rebranding exercise has changed nothing. The alternative Investment Court System, or ICS, may go by a different name but those who stand to benefit remain the corporations and rich individuals.  This sham proposal is an outrageous assault on our democratic rights and freedoms.

“What we will continue to see is the absurdity of countries being sued for introducing anti-smoking legislation, banning toxic chemicals, restricting dirty mining projects and more. In short, the death of democracy and the transfer of taxpayers’ money into the pockets of big business. The anti-democratic European Commission clearly has no interest in the will of the people of Europe.”

UN independent experts have already said ISDS ‘should be abolished’, highlighting how rulings go against human rights law. They also state that arbitration disputes should be settled by domestic courts.

 

Notes for Editors

For further information and interviews, contact John Hilary on +44 7983 550727 or Ross Hemingway on +44 7983 550728

 

Latest news

H&M’s offensive advert is just one thread in the rotten fabric of a deeply racist industry

15 January 2018 - 5:15pm

Written by Thulsi Narayanasamy & Marienna Pope-Weidemann for Open Democracy

 

Will those angered by the H&M advert also support the fightback by the brave and resilient women of colour who produce H&M's clothes for poverty wages?

Read more

Forgetting Marikana: What does Ramaphosa’s rise mean for poor South Africans?

15 January 2018 - 5:00pm

Written by Saranel Benjamin for African Arguments

As director of Lonmin, the multi-millionaire saw miners striking for a living wage as criminals.

 

Read more

Join the conversation

Calling out the H&M advert isn't enough. This is just one thread in the rotten fabric of a deeply #racist industry… https://t.co/VCw2W7qXjG 16 hours 23 min ago
#Carillion accrued massive debts & secretly protected millions in top-boss bonuses while its Chairman advised the P… https://t.co/2Y7yhp1GVp 18 hours 33 min ago
16-year old #AhedTamimi’s detention extended again! Tamimi is one of over 300 Palestinian children held in detentio… https://t.co/2hf7i51BCL 19 hours 41 min ago